1. How effective is the
headline?
The headline is clever as it
uses a pun to get the massage across. The words the author chose are
effective, using “Chicks” to represent the Dixie Chicks. This helps the article
feel more casual and gives the serious topic a more fun edge. The way the
author wrote the “in the Line of Fire” was clever as it helped was talking
about how the band had been in trouble for their slur against President George
W Bush but it also made reference to the fact that they where talking about the
war and troops being sent overseas.
2. The journalist has chosen not
to include an extensive byline. Do you think this is a good decision? Explain
your answer.
I think the idea of not using an
extensive byline was a good idea because some people would have found the
content of the article very confronting, as it is a serious topic.
3. How does the introductory
paragraph help your understanding of what the article will be about?
The introductory paragraph gives
some information on the Dixie Chicks and their beliefs and how and when the
slur was made. So it just gives the reader some insight into the situation and
what happened.
4. What kind of tone do you
think the journalist is trying to achieve? Provide examples to explain your
answer.
The author does seem to use
slightly plain text when writing the article. However the author does show
their own opinion where they seem to be defending the Dixie Chicks so it is
obvious that he is siding with them. The author has both a plain stating tone
much like that of a news reporter would have. Few other stations played Not
Ready to Make Nice, and while it has done well on iTunes, it's quite possible
that in singing about their anger at people who were already livid with them
and were once their target audience. This segment of the article puts forward
that the author does have some issues towards the hate that the Dixie Chicks
were getting and was quite disgusted by it.
5. What do you think the
journalist's purpose was in writing this article? Provide examples to help
prove your answer.
I believe that the author
purpose of writing this article was to defend the Dixie Chicks and their
beliefs. This is visible because towards the end of the article you realize
that the things the Dixie Chicks were doing were positive and that they good
side in the argument whilst everyone else who was attacking their views were
wrong.
6. The journalist makes
considerable use of direct quotations throughout the article. How does this
affect your understanding of the article and influence your opinion of the band
members? Use evidence to support your claims.
The quotes throughout the
article really help the reader to understand the situation more clearly. The
quotes also let the reader develop their own opinion because they are hearing
from people who where a part of it not just from the author who already has
their own opinion. This is shown in the article where is states, "a
four-minute f___-you to the format and our listeners. I like the Chicks, and I
won't play it." This quote shows the reader some of the different
reactions of people to the Dixie Chicks.
7. How effective do you think
this article is in achieving the journalist's purpose? Explain your answer in
full please.